Legal Opinion

Fishel v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1985No. Civ. A. 85-0216PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Defendant, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse), has filed a motion to dismiss. The numerous plaintiffs in this action oppose that motion and have filed their own motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiffs are neighbors of Westinghouse’s plant in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, and of sites used by defendant, Frederick M. Shealer, to dispose of industrial wastes generated at the Gettysburg plant. The complaint alleges, inter alia, violations of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lutz v. Chromatex, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Brewer v. RavanDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1988
  3. Allied Corp. v. Acme Solvents Reclaiming, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  4. United States (EPA) v. Environmental Waste Control, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
  5. Ambrogi v. Gould, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API