Legal Opinion

Ambrogi v. Gould, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 1991No. Civ. 88-1205, 89-0576PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONABOY, Chief Judge.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

I.Introduction

A. Factual Background

B. Procedural Background

II.CERCLA — The Superfund Act

A. CERCLA’s Basic Purposes

B. Application to Private Cost Recovery Suits

C. Response Costs

III.Discussion

A. Standard of Review

1. A Motion to Dismiss Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12

2. A Motion for Summary Judgment Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56

B. Specific Response Costs Alleged

1. Non-Recoverable Costs(a) Medical Monitoring(i) Arguments Presented(ii) Analysis of the Court(b) Organizational Expenses(c) Conclusion

2. Application of the National Contingency Plan(a) Sufficiency of Pleadings(b)…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. James R. WHITE, Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Daigle v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of the Army of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
  4. Bolin v. Cessna Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  5. GJ Leasing Co., Inc. v. Union Elec. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API