Legal Opinion
Longino Castro v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 2, 1963No. 18396PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEIGEL, District Judge.
Appellant and one Nuel Arnold Melton were charged in a two-count indictment with violations of Section 174, Title 21 United States Code. The first count charged a conspiracy to import heroin into the United States and to conceal, sell, transport and facilitate the concealment, sale and transportation of said narcotic drug, knowing the same to have been illegally imported. The second count charged the illegal importation of heroin.
Before trial Melton had jumped bond and disappeared. The trial court ordered severance, appellant acquiescing. Having waived a jury, appellant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Remmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Stoppelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Woodrow W Cape v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Howard P. Carroll and H. Carroll & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,478 United States of America v. Robert Edwin BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Alfred G. Sica v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Arthur Earl Robbins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.