Legal Opinion

Doe v. City of Albuquerque

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 20, 2012No. 10-2102PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents us with a difficult issue of first impression. John Doe, a registered sex offender, brought a facial challenge under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to a ban enacted by the City of Albuquerque that prohibited registered sex offenders from entering the City’s public libraries. The district court denied a motion to dismiss brought by the City and ultimately granted summary judgment in favor of Doe. The court concluded that the ban burdened Doe’s fundamental right to receive information under the First Amendment and that the City failed sufficiently…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Bruni v. City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Supreme Court of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Ward v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. Gregory Hartnett v. Pennsylvania State Education ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  5. Wright v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API