Leavitt v. Hamelin
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C.J.
This case presents a single issue of statutory construction. We are asked to construe the bad check statute, RSA chapter 544-A, and to determine whether this statute’s penalty provisions encompass the award of attorney’s fees to a plaintiff whose suit is successful. RSA 544-A:2. We hold that RSA 544-A:2 does contemplate the award of attorney’s fees and set forth our reasons below.
The plaintiff successfully prosecuted a suit in the Derry District Court against the defendant for issuance by the latter of a bad check. Having received judgment on his claim, the plaintiff sought an award of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Pugliese v. Town of Northwood Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- In re Robyn W.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- McClain v. Continental Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- State v. . YarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hobson v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Ives v. Manchester Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Negro Nest, LLC v. Mid-Northern Management, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Appeal of Rehabilitation Associates of New EnglandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Taber v. Town of WestmorelandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.