Legal Opinion

Leavitt v. Hamelin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 19, 1985No. 84-295PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, C.J.

This case presents a single issue of statutory construction. We are asked to construe the bad check statute, RSA chapter 544-A, and to determine whether this statute’s penalty provisions encompass the award of attorney’s fees to a plaintiff whose suit is successful. RSA 544-A:2. We hold that RSA 544-A:2 does contemplate the award of attorney’s fees and set forth our reasons below.

The plaintiff successfully prosecuted a suit in the Derry District Court against the defendant for issuance by the latter of a bad check. Having received judgment on his claim, the plaintiff sought an award of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Pugliese v. Town of Northwood Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. In re Robyn W.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. McClain v. Continental Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. State v. . YarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hobson v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Ives v. Manchester Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. Negro Nest, LLC v. Mid-Northern Management, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Appeal of Rehabilitation Associates of New EnglandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  5. Taber v. Town of WestmorelandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API