Legal Opinion

United States v. Baysinger

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided August 12, 1981No. ACM 23129PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MILES, Judge:

Consistent with his pleas, the accused was convicted of larceny and housebreaking in violation of Articles 121 and 130, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C.A. §§ 921, 930. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three months, forfeiture of $334.00 for one month and reduction to airman basic.

Appellate defense counsel assert that the military judge erred when he failed to inquire into an inconsistency between the accused’s guilty pleas and his sworn testimony during sentencing. We disagree.

At trial, the accused’s pleas…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. TimminsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  3. United States v. LuebsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  4. United States v. DeaversU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. KoppU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. CollinsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  2. United States v. RiceU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. MarcyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  4. United States v. NicholsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. NeelyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API