Legal Opinion

United States v. Luebs

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 9, 1971No. 23,485PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Judge:

After negotiating a pretrial agreement, the appellant pleaded guilty to sodomy and assault with intent to commit rape. His sentence, imposed by a military judge, now consists of a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, reduction in grade, and two years’ confinement at hard labor, the convening authority having reduced the confinement by one year. The question to be decided concerns the providence of Luebs’s guilty plea.

In deciding this issue at the trial level, the military judge first considered a stipulation of fact introduced as a prosecution exhibit.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. ButlerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. HolladayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  4. United States v. HollinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. PenisterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. MogliaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
  4. United States v. LoganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973
  5. United States v. WhiteU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API