Legal Opinion

Rudy Choy, Warren Seaman and Alfred Kumulae, Co-Partners Doing Business as Choy, Seaman and Kumulae v. Elmer H. Bouchelle

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 9, 1970No. 16584PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GANEY, Circuit Judge

A jury awarded plaintiffs $15,000 on their claim for the balance due them by defendant under both a design fee and a boat construction contract and for special damages, and found against the latter on his counterclaim for loss of a charter season. The district court denied, without opinion, defendant’s post-trial motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial wherein it was alleged that the contract was so vague and indefinite with regard to prices, the times of delivery and what was to be delivered, as to render it unenforceable. Additionally, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Atkinson v. RothCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Plains Township Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. Structural Rubber Products Company v. Park Rubber Company and International Metals and MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Edward C. Smith v. Borough of WilkinsburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Sulzer Textil A.G. And Sulzer Textile, Inc. v. Picanol N v. Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Albert Junior HolleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API