Legal Opinion

Breon-Armold Motor Co. v. Fuller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1931No. 29,719PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

The action was for replevin of an automobile. Defendant filed answer and cross petition. He recovered the value of the automobile and damages for money expended for attorney fees and punitive damages for malicious prosecution of the suit. Plaintiff appeals.

The appellant sold an automobile to a man by the name of Parsons, who paid part of the purchase price in cash and gave a mortgage on the car for the balance. The mortgage contained a provision that in case the mortgagee should deem itself insecure it would have the right to seize the car.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. RembertDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922
  2. Blair v. BlairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Garrett Biblical Institute v. MinardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Carbondale Investment Co. v. BurdickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Elfert v. ElfertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barrett v. HurdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. State v. GreerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API