Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Hurd

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 28, 1933No. 30,872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action of replevin for an automobile. Judgment was for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The petition alleged the execution of a note and the giving of a mortgage on the automobile in question by Charles Wettig. It further alleged the failure of Wettig to pay the note and the special ownership of plaintiff in the automobile. The petition further alleged that defendant was in possession of the automobile and refused to deliver it to plaintiff on demand.

The answer was a general denial.

At the trial the court held the burden of proof was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Breon-Armold Motor Co. v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meyers & Batzell v. MoezieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Chapman v. BoyntonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1933
  3. Barrett v. HurdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API