Legal Opinion

People v. Printup

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance *1001of counsel. “[T]he evidence, the law, and the circumstances of [this] case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that the attorney provided meaningful representation” (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contentions that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial and that County Court erred in refusing to conduct a hearing on the composition of the jury pool. We decline…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. BachmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. BillingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. JurgensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. People v. WalterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API