Legal Opinion

State v. Bethke

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 2009No. 20080159PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Scott Bethke appeals from a criminal judgment entered finding him guilty of: corruption of a minor; sexual assault; indecent exposure; unlawful possession of a controlled substance — methamphetamine; and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia. We conclude the trial court did not err in refusing to dismiss all counts with prejudice or in denying Beth-ke’s motion to dismiss. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On February 16, 2005, officers of the Minot Police Department were dispatched on a welfare check to room 149 at the Days Inn Motel in Minot, North Dakota. Upon entry, rescue…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. SmudaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Walker v. SchneiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CarpenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Fonder v. FonderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. FICKERTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. KirkpatrickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. ChacanoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API