Legal Opinion
Booth Fisheries Corp. v. Bowles
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided February 13, 1946No. 266PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Chief Judge.
The complaint now before us seeks to set aside Maximum Price Regulation 579, insofar as it discriminates against the complainant in its business as a wholesaler of fish both frozen and fresh.
The complainant has been engaged in the fish business for more than fifty years and the methods employed by it in the sale and distribution of fish have continued without material change throughout that time. It produces fish and also purchases fish from other producers. It processes and accumulates fish in quantity at various points throughout the United States. From these points it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Safeway Stores v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
- Consolidated Water Power & Paper Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
- Hawaii Brewing Corp. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
- Flett v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
- Capitol Foundry Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by11 opinions
- Duncan Coffee Co. v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1949
- Norman-Frank, Inc. v. Arnall, Director of Price StabilizationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1952
- G. R. Kinney Co. v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Bayuk Cigars, Inc. v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Markbreiter v. WoodsEmergency Court of Appeals · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.