Legal Opinion
Duncan Coffee Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided December 16, 1949No. 500PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
178 F.2d 926
DUNCAN COFFEE CO.
v.
RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION.
No. 500.
United States Emergency Court of Appeals.
Heard at Houston, Texas, September 29, 1949.
Decided December 16, 1949.
Samuel H. Peak, Houston, Tex., for complainant.
George Arthur Fruit, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., with whom Joseph M. Friedman, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, was on the brief, and William G. Winters, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Houston, Texas, for respondent.
Before MARIS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and LINDLEY, Judges.
McALLISTER, Judge.
1
Complainant, Duncan Coffee…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Emergency Court of Appeals · 1947
- WM. Schluderberg-T. J. Kurdle Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Emergency Court of Appeals · 1948
- Booth Fisheries Corp. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Electromatic Distributors, Inc. v. ClarkEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
3Cited by6 opinions
- H. P. Coffee Company v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1954
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Service Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Swift & Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. FreehillEmergency Court of Appeals · 1953
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Service Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.