Legal Opinion

Carr v. Geoghegan

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1929No. 11,030PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.

This is an action in boundary. The line in dispute is that which forms or should form the rear line of most of the properties fronting on the upper side of Audubon Boulevard.

The old Foucher Plantation formerly comprised the property which is now occupied by Loyola University, Tulane University and the properties fronting on both sides of Audubon Boulevard.

Defendant owns five lots fronting on the upper side of Audubon Boulevard. Plaintiff’s property fronts on Green Street, and its side line is contiguous to the rear line of a part of defendant’s property. Audubon Street is parallel to Audubon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Opdenwyer v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Williams v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  4. Gray v. CouvillonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. MonroseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Smith v. ScarpengosLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Collett v. OtisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Owens v. T. Miller & Sons Building Supply Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API