Legal Opinion

Indiana Department of Correction v. Hulen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1991No. 46S03-9112-SC-984PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Need a State agency waive the client-attorney privilege it has with the Attorney General in order to prevail on a motion to dismiss a tort action? We hold that it need not.

Appellee Terry Hulen brought a small claims action against the Department of Correction and the Indiana State Prison to recover damages for items of personal property which he says were lost or stolen while in their possession. The trial court rendered judgment for Hulen.

On appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment, except for the entry of costs against the State. Indiana Department of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Galbreath v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Geyer v. City of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Indiana State Highway Commission v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. J.A.W. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. HoganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Gutierrez v. City of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2012
  4. Calvin v. SchauerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
  5. JAW v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API