Legal Opinion

J.A.W. v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1995No. 32A01-9212-CV-415PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RUCKER, Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant J.A.W. sued the State of Indiana (the State), the Marion County Department of Public Welfare (DPW), the Marion County Probation Department (Probation) and Marion County Probation Officer Brian Toepp (referred to collectively as Defendants). He asserted various tort theories of recovery as well as various civil rights violations under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Defendants moved for summary judgment which the trial court granted. JAW. filed this interlocutory appeal raising six issues for our review which we consolidate and rephrase as…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Louis Kujawski v. Board of Commissioners of Bartholomew County, Indiana, and Bartholomew County Community Corrections DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Lake County Juvenile Court v. SwansonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Mendenhall v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Newman v. DeiterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. JAW v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API