Legal Opinion
Bissell Lumber Co. v. Northwestern Casualty & Surety Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.
The main contention of the appellant Surety Company is that the contract of the plaintiff, whereby it sold and delivered materials to the contractor, was absolutely void by virtue of sec. 348.28, formerly sec. 4549, Stats., which reads in part as follows:
“Any officer, agent or clerk ... of any . . . school district . . . who shall have, reserve or acquire any pecuniary interest, directly or indirectly, present or prospective, absolute or conditional, in any way or manner, in any purchase or sale of any personal or real property or thing in action, *346or in any contract, proposal or bid in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Edward E. Gillen Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shulse v. City of MayvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Murphy v. PaullWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Town of Swiss v. United States National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. RobinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.