Legal Opinion

Town of Swiss v. United States National Bank

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed April 3, 1928:

Stevens, J.(1) The single question presented is whether the plaintiff town is entitled to a judgment enjoining the transfer and compelling the cancellation of the note in question.

All who take the obligation of a town to pay money must ascertain for themselves whether the obligation was “issued by competent authority, and a purchaser of a town order [or note] takes it at his peril of the fact. If not issued by competent authority, the town is not liable. The law is well settled that the officers of a town, or of any municipal corporation, cannot…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Land, Log & Lumber Co. v. McIntyreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. First Wisconsin National Bank v. Town of CatawbaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Veeder v. Town of LimaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Town of Rochester v. Alfred BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Quayle v. Bayfield CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Reetz v. KitchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State v. BennettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Village of Milton Junction v. Town of MiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Lurye v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API