Town of Swiss v. United States National Bank
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed April 3, 1928:
Stevens, J.(1) The single question presented is whether the plaintiff town is entitled to a judgment enjoining the transfer and compelling the cancellation of the note in question.
All who take the obligation of a town to pay money must ascertain for themselves whether the obligation was “issued by competent authority, and a purchaser of a town order [or note] takes it at his peril of the fact. If not issued by competent authority, the town is not liable. The law is well settled that the officers of a town, or of any municipal corporation, cannot…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Land, Log & Lumber Co. v. McIntyreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- First Wisconsin National Bank v. Town of CatawbaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Veeder v. Town of LimaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
- Town of Rochester v. Alfred BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
- Quayle v. Bayfield CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. RobinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Reetz v. KitchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. BennettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Village of Milton Junction v. Town of MiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Lurye v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.