Southall v. Humbert
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
In this appeal, we are asked to determine the propriety of the final decree that dismissed the complaint brought by Dorothy Southall and her daughter Marliess Antolik, which averred that William and Carol Humbert did not have an easement for a water line across their property. The Order in question found that the Humberts have a water line easement appurtenant to the Southall-Antolik property. We affirm.
The facts are not disputed. Southall and Antolik own a parcel of real estate designated as lot number 51 on the Ligonier Township tax map # 51-15-00. The Humberts own a parcel…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Finley v. Glenn Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Wilkes-Barre Township School District v. CorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Piper v. MowrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Lauderbach-Zerby Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Hostetter v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Phillippi v. KnotterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- PA Energy Vision, LLC v. South Avis Realty, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Kapp v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Walters v. SporerNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Citifinancial Services, Inc. v. Haburjak (In Re Haburjak)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.