Legal Opinion

In Re: Ronald Seastrunk

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 18, 2017No. 2017-B -0178PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrichton, J.

This attorney disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") against respondent, Ronald Seastrunk, an assistant district attorney in Vernon Parish. Specifically, ODC alleges respondent violated Rule 3.8(d) of the Louisiana Rules of Professional Conduct in failing to disclose exculpatory evidence. As a result, this Court must now determine an issue of first impression with ramifications beyond this respondent: whether the ethical duty outlined in Rule 3.8(d) is broader than the similar duty outlined by the United States Supreme Court's…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  5. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re: Petition To Stay The Effectiveness of Formal Ethics Opinion 2017-F-163Tennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In re BokenfohrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2018
  3. In the Matter of Trista A. HudsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API