Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Trista A. Hudson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2018No. Supreme Court Case 64S00-1705-DI-325Published

1Per curiam

We find that Respondent, Trista Hudson, committed attorney misconduct by failing to disclose exculpatory evidence and by prosecuting a charge she knew was not supported by probable cause. For this misconduct, we conclude that Respondent should be suspended for at least eighteen months without automatic reinstatement.

This matter is before the Court on the report of the hearing officer appointed by this Court on the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission's verified disciplinary complaint. Respondent's 1998 admission to this state's bar subjects her to this Court's disciplinary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. FelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State of Indiana v. Brian J. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In the Matter of: Terry Lee SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. In re HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API