Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re: Petition To Stay The Effectiveness of Formal Ethics Opinion 2017-F-163

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2019No. M2018-01932-SC-BAR-BPPublished

1Opinion of the Court

08/23/2019 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 30, 2019 Session IN RE: PETITION TO STAY THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FORMAL ETHICS OPINION 2017-F-163 No. M2018-01932-SC-BAR-BP The Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference (“TNDAGC”) filed with this Court a petition to vacate Formal Ethics Opinion 2017-F-163 (“Opinion”) issued by the Board of Professional Responsibility (“Board”) regarding ethical considerations for prosecutors under Rule 3.8(d) of the Tennessee Rules of Professional Conduct. The TNDAGC also requested that the Court stay the effectiveness of the Opinion pending…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Cone v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API