Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. CSR Ltd. v. MacQueen

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1994No. 21994PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEELY, Justice:

CSR Limited (hereinafter “CSR”) is a new and unique type of defendant in that black hole of litigation — consolidated asbestos cases. Between 1948 and 1966 CSR was sales agent for its partially-owned subsidiary that mined raw asbestos fibers. The raw asbestos fibers were sold F.O.B. Freemantle, Australia and other ports in Western Australia to Johns Manville Corporation which then delivered them to the United States. Because Johns Manville had its own mines and purchased asbestos fibers from several other mines throughout the world, Johns Manville received only a small portion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Hodge v. Sands Manufacturing CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. HILL BY HILL v. Showa Denko, KKWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Blankenship v. General Motors Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. CSR LTD. v. LinkTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Merriman v. Crompton Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. Abbott v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Easterling v. American Optical Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. SER Ford Motor Co. v. Hon. Warren R. McGraw, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API