State v. Roman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issue in this criminal appeal is whether, in the absence of a continuous word-*64for-word translation of English into Spanish, the trial court should have suppressed, as coerced and involuntary, the inculpatory statements elicited during a custodial interrogation of the defendant, Miguel Roman, a Spanish speaking person. A jury found the defendant guilty of the crime of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a,1 and the trial court sentenced him to a term of imprisonment of sixty years. He appeals from the judgment of conviction to this court pursuant to General Statutes §…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- United States of America Ex Rel. Rogelio Nieves Negron v. The State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. CrespoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. MedinaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. SaurisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. MunozSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. SantiagoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.