Legal Opinion

State v. Roman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 17, 1992No. 14073PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The principal issue in this criminal appeal is whether, in the absence of a continuous word-*64for-word translation of English into Spanish, the trial court should have suppressed, as coerced and involuntary, the inculpatory statements elicited during a custodial interrogation of the defendant, Miguel Roman, a Spanish speaking person. A jury found the defendant guilty of the crime of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a,1 and the trial court sentenced him to a term of imprisonment of sixty years. He appeals from the judgment of conviction to this court pursuant to General Statutes §…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Rogelio Nieves Negron v. The State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. CrespoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. State v. MedinaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. SaurisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. State v. MunozSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. State v. SantiagoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API