Estate of Hirshfeld v. Islamic Republic of Iran
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
In the instant case, there is more than a "reasonable connection" between Iran's provision of material support, in the form of financing, weapons, training and ideological support, and the act of terrorism in this case. Plaintiffs presented expert testimony that Iran's support of Hamas was given to allow this group to commit precisely the type of militant terrorist act in Israel as occurred in this case. Clawson Tr. 74 (Hamas was founded in 1987 to carry out militant attacks against Israel, and Iran turned to Hamas as the "principal instrument" they used to sponsor terrorist attacks against…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Valore v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- James Owens v. Republic of SudanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Murphy v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Hill v. Republic of IraqCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- K.E.F.V. v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
- All Represented by John Driscoll v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- All Represented by John Driscoll v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Barry v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Boothe v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.