Holliman v. Redman Development Corp.
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Presented for decision is plaintiff’s motion for an order requiring defendant to answer written interrogatories propounded by plaintiff pursuant to federal discovery rules.1 Defendant has answered the interrogatories with the exception of Interrogatory No. 19 2 wherein plaintiff, a citizen of South Carolina, seeks to discover the net worth of defendant corporation, organized under the laws of the State of Texas. Defendant refuses to answer on the ground that this fact is immaterial and irrelevant to the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Thomas Organ Co. v. Jadranska Slobodna PlovidbaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Freeman v. SeligsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Charles v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Horizons Titanium Corporation v. Norton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Miller v. Doctor's General HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- Corporate Air v. Edwards Jet CenterMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- McClain v. Mack Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Mid Continent Cabinetry, Inc. v. George Koch Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Breault v. FriedliCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.