Legal Opinion
Fitch v. State
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 12, 1952PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
The first count of the complaint in this action alleges that a quitclaim deed given by an ancestor of the plaintiffs purporting to convey to the defendant his reversionary interest in land was executed under a mistake of fact and that the condition upon which the reverter depended had occurred. In their prayers for relief, the plaintiffs requested the court to declare that the deed was null and void and that legal title had reverted to them. The second count of the complaint is not involved in this appeal.
The case was referred to a state referee and he made a report containing a finding of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Park Bros. v. Blodgett & Clapp Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Bronson v. LeiboldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Donovan v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. FoordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- State v. CarboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Berniere v. KrippsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- State v. BurneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Blake Construction Co., Inc. v. American Vocational Association, Inc. And Riggs National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.