Legal Opinion

Doughty v. De Amoreel

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 27, 1900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Action brought under Gren. Laws R. I. cap. 233, § 16. The statute is as follows: ‘ ‘ Whenever any person shall be convicted of larceny, he shall be liable to the owner of the money or articles taken for twice the value thereof, unless the same be restored, and for the value thereof in case of restoration.” The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtStiness, C. J.

The plaintiff sues under the provisions of Gren. Laws cap. 233, § 16, to recover the double value of goods stolen. The section says: “Whenever any person shall be convicted of larceny,” etc. In this case the defendant pleaded nolo contendere to an indictment for larceny, and thereupon, under Pub. Laws, January, 1899, cap. 661, § 1, he was placed under the control and supervision of a probation officer. The question is whether these facts amount to a conviction. The District Court'held that the defendant had been convicted, and gave a decision for the plaintiff for double the value of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. GorhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. Imperial Mutual Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Vinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Morin v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  4. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  5. Beauchemin v. SweetenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API