Legal Opinion
State v. Briggs
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided November 16, 2007No. 2005-62-C.A., 2006-13-C.APublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice FLAHERTY, for the Court.
What should the final result be when a criminal defendant successfully completes his or her obligations under a deferred sentence agreement pursuant to G.L. 1956 § 12-19-19? Both the defendants here, James Briggs and Anna M. Mathias, successfully completed deferred sentence agreements and then moved in the Superi- or Court for orders expunging all indications of their respective offenses from their criminal records. They timely appealed 1 after a hearing justice of that court denied their motions, reasoning that the defendants were not entitled to an…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Brennan v. KirbySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
- Kaya v. PartingtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- United States v. LindiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp. v. Bowen Court AssociatesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ryan v. Roman Catholic Bishop of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- State v. BouffardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- State v. Linda A. DiamanteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
- State v. GouletSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- State v. Doris E. PoulinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.