Legal Opinion

Beauchemin v. Sweeten

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 16, 1984No. 81-97-AppealPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEVILACQUA, Chief Justice.

This is a civil action for assault brought by the plaintiff to recover for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of the defendant’s attack. The case was tried before a justice of the Superior Court and a jury. After a verdict was returned for the defendant, the plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial, which was granted. The defendant appeals, and the plaintiff cross-appeals on the ground that the defendant’s plea of nolo contendere in the related criminal proceeding should have been admitted to impeach defendant’s credibility in the civil action.

The record…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barbato v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
  2. Fox v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  3. Yammerino v. Cranston Tennis Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  4. State v. GobernSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  5. Doughty v. De AmoreelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. MattatallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  2. State v. HenshawSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  3. State v. DameSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  4. State v. LuanglathSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. State v. VanasseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API