Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Miller

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1904No. 4,527PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Floyd Circuit Court; E. G. Henry, Judge pro tem. Action by William L. Miller against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.

Action for damages on account of personal injuries. Judgment for $2,750. Appellee was a passenger on one of appellant’s passenger trains running between New Albany and Jeffersonville. lie desired to alight at Uinth street station in the former city, to which point he had purchased his ticket. Ho question is made as to the sufficiency of the complaint, in so far as appellant’s negligence is concerned. It is averred: That said station was reached about five minutes before 11 o’clock p. m. on January 29, 1901; that the night was dark and stormy, much rain having fallen, rendering appellant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Watkins v. Birmingham Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. England v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Carr v. River & Eureka RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Distler v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. MullenIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Winona & Warsaw Railway Co. v. RousseauIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co. v. CollinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BoysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API