Legal Opinion
Robinson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided July 22, 1970No. 43025PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Judge.
The offense is robbery by assault; the punishment, assessed by the jury, 35 years.
The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is not challenged and a recitation of the facts is not deemed necessary.
In his first three grounds of error appellant contends he was forced to accept representation by court appointed counsel.
The indictment was returned on April 21, 1969, and although we find no written request for the appointment of counsel, no pauper’s oath, or any formal order of appointment in the record, it is observed that the docket sheet reflects that on April…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. William BentvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Thomas Lorenzo Williams v. Dr. George Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Dennis Randel v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rodriquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Ex Parte BainCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Stovall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Harriel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.