Legal Opinion

Harriel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1978No. 54845PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DALLY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for attempted murder; punishment is imprisonment for twelve years.

The trial court’s failure to appoint counsel to represent appellant during his trial is asserted to be reversible error. The State responds that the appellant attempted to manipulate his right to counsel in such a manner as to obstruct and interfere with the fair administration of justice and that the court did not err in failing to appoint counsel.

Art. 26.04(a), V.A.C.C.P., provides:

“Whenever the court determines at an arraignment or at any time prior to arraignment that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Foley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gray v. RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Minjares v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Freeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Switzer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API