Legal Opinion

Continental Motion Pictures v. Allstate Film Co.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 3, 1984No. CV 83-2858-ER (MCX)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

RAFEEDIE, District Judge.

1. INTRODUCTION

Defendants Len Turner (“Turner”) and All State Film Company (“All State”) seek to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint 1 for breach of contract, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation on the ground that the Court allegedly lacks diversity jurisdiction 2 over this action because defendant Turner is a citizen of California and defendants allege plaintiff Continental Motion Pictures (“Continental”) has a dual corporate citizenship including a principal place of business in Los Angeles.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cameron v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Martha Eck v. United Arab Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  3. Eisenberg v. Commercial Union Assurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  4. SOUTHEAST GUAR. TR. CO., LTD. v. Rodman & Renshaw, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
  5. Andy Jerguson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarily Situated v. Blue Dot Investment, Inc., a Panamanian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Danjaq, S.A. v. Pathe Communications Corporation Mgm-Pathe Communications Co. Tracinda Corporation Kirk Kerkorian Mgm/ua Communications Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Luksch v. LathamDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
  3. Danjaq, S.A. v. MGM/UA Communications, Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1991
  4. David K. Lindemuth Co. v. Shannon Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API