Continental Motion Pictures v. Allstate Film Co.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
RAFEEDIE, District Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION
Defendants Len Turner (“Turner”) and All State Film Company (“All State”) seek to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint 1 for breach of contract, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation on the ground that the Court allegedly lacks diversity jurisdiction 2 over this action because defendant Turner is a citizen of California and defendants allege plaintiff Continental Motion Pictures (“Continental”) has a dual corporate citizenship including a principal place of business in Los Angeles.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cameron v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Martha Eck v. United Arab Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Eisenberg v. Commercial Union Assurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- SOUTHEAST GUAR. TR. CO., LTD. v. Rodman & Renshaw, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
- Andy Jerguson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarily Situated v. Blue Dot Investment, Inc., a Panamanian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Danjaq, S.A. v. Pathe Communications Corporation Mgm-Pathe Communications Co. Tracinda Corporation Kirk Kerkorian Mgm/ua Communications Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Luksch v. LathamDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
- Danjaq, S.A. v. MGM/UA Communications, Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1991
- David K. Lindemuth Co. v. Shannon Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1987