Valente v. Costantino
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltble, C. J.
In December, 1926, the plaintiff was engaged in constructing an apartment house upon certain premises owned by his wife. The defendant loaned them $11,800 and later $5600, in each instance receiving a mortgage upon the premises executed by the wife. Within less than a month after the second mortgage was given, the plaintiff’s wife conveyed the property to him. He then executed to Dominick Celotto a negotiable note for $20,000 payable on demand, secured by a mortgage upon the premises. The plaintiff’s indebtedness to Celotto at the time did not exceed $3150, although some time later Celotto…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Desiderio v. IadonisiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Braman v. . BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Tedens v. SchumersIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Peck v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lenox Realty Co. v. HackettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Markham v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- U.S.I.F. Norman Corp. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Lewis v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Cassidy v. BonitatibusConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985