Legal Opinion

Valente v. Costantino

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 21, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltble, C. J.

In December, 1926, the plaintiff was engaged in constructing an apartment house upon certain premises owned by his wife. The defendant loaned them $11,800 and later $5600, in each instance receiving a mortgage upon the premises executed by the wife. Within less than a month after the second mortgage was given, the plaintiff’s wife conveyed the property to him. He then executed to Dominick Celotto a negotiable note for $20,000 payable on demand, secured by a mortgage upon the premises. The plaintiff’s indebtedness to Celotto at the time did not exceed $3150, although some time later Celotto…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  2. Desiderio v. IadonisiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Braman v. . BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  4. Tedens v. SchumersIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Peck v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lenox Realty Co. v. HackettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  2. Markham v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. U.S.I.F. Norman Corp. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Lewis v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Cassidy v. BonitatibusConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API