Legal Opinion
Markham v. Smith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 21, 1935PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
On November 27th, 1914, Mennone owned a tract of land in Madison and on that day he mortgaged it to Chittenden to secure a note for $2000. This mortgage was later assigned to the plaintiff. On May 21st, 1919, Mennone conveyed part of the tract, which we shall call parcel A, by warranty deed, free of incumbrances, to Scranton and by mesne conveyance the title to it came to the defendant. On December 21st, 1922, Mennone conveyed another part of the tract, which we shall call parcel B, to the Lovedays, by warranty deed subject to a balance of $1500 due upon the mortgage from him to Chittenden;…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Cooper v. BiglyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Belknap v. GleasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
- Gaul v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Hall v. MorganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Danbury v. Dana Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. OwenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Leonard v. BailwitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Huntington v. McCartySupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.