Legal Opinion
Cassidy v. Bonitatibus
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 17, 1985No. 3121PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The plaintiff is appealing from a judgment rendered for the defendants in an action for damages resulting from the defendants’ alleged assumption of a mortgage.
The parties entered into a written agreement wherein the defendants agreed to buy certain real estate from the plaintiff for a total purchase price of $38,000. The agreement provided for a mortgage contingency of $28,000. Prior to the closing, the defendants informed the plaintiff that they could not obtain the desired financing, and further negotiations ensued. At the closing, the plaintiff delivered to the defendants a warranty deed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Olean v. TregliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Lavigne v. LavigneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Lenox Realty Co. v. HackettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Raffel v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Godiksen v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Roban Realty, Inc. v. FaileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Coleman v. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane (In Re Coleman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1989