Legal Opinion

Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc. v. Hughes, Hubbard, & Reed

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided July 13, 1995No. 01-92-01114-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s granting of the special appearance of appel-lee, Hughes, Hubbard & Reed (hereinafter HHR). Appellants, Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. and Shearson Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (collectively Shearson), contend that trial court erred when it dismissed their malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty claims against HHR. We are presented with the issue of whether HHR’s contacts with the State of Texas were sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction. We hold that they were not, and affirm the trial court’s dismissal.

Standard of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. James v. Illinois Central Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  2. Lehman Bros. v. Hughes Hubbard & Reed, L. L. P.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Klenk v. Bustamante, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  4. N803RA, INC. v. Hammer, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  5. Lamb v. Turbine Designs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API