Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Turbine Designs, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided March 11, 1999No. 4:99-cv-00024PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HUNT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs claim that defendant Turbine Designs, Inc. (“Turbine”) misappropriated their design for a proprietary modification technique to be used to upgrade older Beechcraft King Air Aircraft and seek a preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Turbine to return all confidential information and preventing it from using that information. Plaintiffs’ complaint is grounded solely in the state law claims of violation of the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act, violation of the Georgia Trade Secrets Act, theft of trade secrets, misappropriation of proprietary…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atlantigas Corp. v. Nisource, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  2. Management Insights, Inc. v. CIC Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API