Legal Opinion

N803RA, INC. v. Hammer

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 6, 2000No. 01-98-01385-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERIC ANDELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s granting of the special appearance of ap-pellees, Michael and Janelle Hammer, individually and d/b/a Aerodesigns. Appellant, N803RA, Inc., contends the trial court erred when it dismissed its suit alleging violations of statutory and common-law duties, and breach of contract and warranty. We are asked to decide whether (1) Aerodesigns’ letter dated May 21, 1998, was a general appearance and (2) if it was not, whether Aerodesigns’ contacts with Texas were sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction. We affirm.

Facts

Appellees,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance, Ltd. v. English China Clays, P.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Schlobohm v. SchapiroTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Kawasaki Steel Corp. v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Valsangiacomo v. Americana Juice Import, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  2. Lámar v. Poncon, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  3. Lang v. Capital Resource Investments, I & II, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  4. Y. Gina Lisitsa and Lisitsa Law Corporation v. Florina Flit, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  5. Gonzalez v. AAG Las Vegas, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API