Oklahoma City Land & Development Co. v. Adams Engineering & Blueprinting Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action by the Adams Engineering & Blueprinting Company against the Oklahoma City Land & Development Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant named brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RITTENHOUSE; C.
This is an action to recover a balance of $136.50 due upon an oral contract to survey a part of the S. W. % of section 11, township 12 N., range 3 E. .1. M. Issues were joined and the cause tried to a jury, resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
It is argued that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence. Upon an examination of the record we find that H. C. Adams testified to the terms of the oral contract; that the work was performed under such contract by surveying the tract of land and subdividing the same into lots, blocks, streets, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Producers' Oil Co. v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- City of Guthrie v. SnyderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- McKemie v. AlbrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Dickinson v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Champlin Oil and Refining Company v. RoeverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Muller v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.