Legal Opinion
People v. Richter
New York District Court
Decided December 20, 1979PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Fertig, J.
The defendant raises a question, previously undetermined in New York, where he is charged with operating a motor vehicle with .10% or more alcohol in his blood in violation of subdivision 2 of section 1192 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law.
After being arraigned the defendant moved, as part of an omnibus motion, for an order of discovery and inspection, requesting the production of any comparison ampoule and gouge test ampoule, which may have been used in connection with the administration of a breathalyzer test. The People’s answering affirmation stated that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Killian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lauderdale v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. TorresCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1984
- People v. McCannNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. ReedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- People v. ShepherdJustice Court of Town of Brighton · 1983
- People v. Le PreeRochester City Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.