Legal Opinion

The Princess Sophia

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 19, 1929No. 4553PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

The claimants petition a rehearing on the ground that the court erred in limiting its jurisdiction in this proceeding, and in that objection could be made to foreign administrator on the hearing and without plea in abatement, and that an answer to the merits on the general issue did not waive the disability to sue, and also that it was error to hold that on failure to file a claim for two years, liability ceased, and also in its conclusion upon the facts and in the assessment of damages; also, petition that local administrators be substituted as plaintiffs for foreign…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Noonan v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. McDonald v. NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Haakanson v. Wakefield Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cleveland Tankers, Inc. v. TierneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  3. Fernández Ramírez v. Registrador de la Propiedad de GuayamaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  4. In re Canada S. S. Lines, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950
  5. Rardin v. MessickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API