Busk v. Hoard
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentOtt, C. J.
(dissenting)—Did Maurice A. Hoard and Clara Hoard, his wife, enter into a usurious loan agreement with Hans M. Busk? The trial court, after weighing the evidence, answered the query in the negative. The majority, after weighing or totally disregarding the evidence, answer the query in the affirmative. I believe the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed for the following reasons:
The usury statutes provide that, if a rate of interest in excess of 12 per cent is contracted for or received or reserved, the contract shall not be void, but the parties thereto will be subject to certain…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Malstrom v. KallandWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Calvin Philips & Co. v. LanglowWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Colagrossi v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.