Legal Opinion

Looksmart Grp., Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 28, 2019No. Case No. 17-cv-04709-JSTPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge

Before the Court is Defendant Microsoft Corp.'s motion to strike portions of Plaintiff Looksmart Group, Inc.'s expert report *1225on damages. ECF No. 108. The Court will deny the motion.1

I. BACKGROUND

In this patent dispute, Looksmart claims that Microsoft's Bing search engine and related services infringe Looksmart's patent, U.S. Patent Number 7,356,530 (the " '530 patent"). Complaint ("Compl."), ECF No. 1 ¶ 29.

Looksmart filed this action on August 15, 2017. ECF No. 1. On May 22, 2018, Looksmart served its damages contentions pursuant to this district's…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. EchazabalSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. SAS Institute Inc. v. IancuSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Goodman v. Staples the Office Super-Store, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. BP West Coast Products LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  2. Concurrent Ventures, LLC, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  3. Finjan, LLC v. Qualys Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
  4. Finjan, LLC v. Qualys Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
  5. In re ChromaCode LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API