Legal Opinion

Finjan, LLC v. Qualys Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 5, 2021No. 4:18-cv-07229Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 FINJAN, INC., CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR 7 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING 8 vs. IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE 9 QUALYS INC., Re: Dkt. No. 156, 157, 158, 163 10 Defendant. 11 12 Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) brings this patent infringement action against defendant 13 Qualys Inc. (“Qualys”) for direct and indirect infringement of its patents. Now before the Court is 14 Qualys’ motion strike certain portions of Finjan’s infringement and damages expert reports. (Dkt. 15 No. 158 (“Mot.”).) Qualys…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Huawei Techs., Co. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Looksmart Grp., Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API