Legal Opinion
All Cycle, Inc. v. Chittenden Solid Waste District
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 20, 1995No. 94-511PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.
Plaintiff All Cycle, Inc. appeals from the Chittenden Superior Court’s dismissal of its three-count complaint, which alleged that the defendant Chittenden Solid Waste District’s waste manage-' ment scheme violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. Plaintiff requested injunctive, declaratory, and monetary relief. We reverse, except for the court’s dismissal of injunctive relief in Count I, which we affirm.
Defendant is a union municipal district organized under 24 V.S.A. chapter 121. Pursuant to the Solid Waste Management Ordinance, enacted by defendant on June 24,1992, all…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Holton v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- H. Brooke Paige v. State of Vermont, Secretary of State James Condos, Attorney General William Sorrell, Rafael Edward Cruz and Marco Antonio RubioSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- In Re ColletteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Paige v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.