Legal Opinion
Paige v. State
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 18, 2013No. 12-439PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. Plaintiff H. Brooke Paige appeals a decision by the Washington Superior Court, Civil Division, granting a motion to dismiss by the State and its Secretary of State James Condos.1 *304Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in dismissing the suit on jurisdiction.1 grounds because injury to his life, liberty, and property confers standing, as do Vermont election statutes, 17 V.S.A. §§ 2603 and 2617. Plaintiff also asserts that the past presidential election does not render his case moot because this Court can still provide declaratory relief. We disagree, and dismiss the appeal as moot.
¶ 2.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Doria v. University of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- In re P.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- In Re Grievance of MoriartySupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- State v. TallmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Price v. Town of FairleeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- H. Brooke Paige v. State of Vermont, Secretary of State James Condos, Attorney General William Sorrell, Rafael Edward Cruz and Marco Antonio RubioSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- In re Hopkins Certificate of Compliance (Bernard J. Boudreau, Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- Cameron v. RolloSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In re M.M., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- State v. Anthony Gotavaskas / State v. Grant S. BercikSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.