Terrill v. Laney
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Plaintiff in error, H. A. Terrill, as plaintiff, instituted this action against defendant in error, Kathryn Laney, and Willard Burton to recover possession of parts of lots one and two, block 33, city of Marietta, Oklahoma, and to quiet title to the whole of said lots. Burton defaulted in appearance and the issues between plaintiff and Kathryn Laney, hereafter "referred to as defendant, were tried to a jury, resulting in verdict and judgment for defendant, from which plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff deraigns his title from C. L. Laney, divorced husband of defendant. Defendant, then occupying the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Warner v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Goldsborough v. HewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Murphy v. McElroySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Skinner Et Ux. v. Scott Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Chamberlain v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shaffer v. JefferySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Harkrider v. PoseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Mabry v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Maloy v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Johnson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.